As Congress discourse the Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 ( H.R. 2454)—the notorious crownwork - and - deal bill — those in the agriculture sector wonder how they will be affected economically by likely change in U.S. mood change insurance .
“ Overall , the research suggest U.S. agriculture has more to take in than lose with the passage of H.R. 2454 , ” said Bill Golden , a research help prof at KSU ’s Department of Agriculture Economics who led the written report . “ The bill specifically exempts yield agriculture from emission caps , provides provisions to ease the passage to gamey fertilizer prices and Stephen Foster the development of C offset securities industry , which will likely enhance agricultural revenues . ”
Globally , the agriculture industry is creditworthy for 15 percent of emissions , Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack say attendees at the Agriculture and Rural Development Day in Copenhagen on December 12 , 2009 . Thus , the Department of Agriculture industry must trifle a role in mitigating climate modification .
The neb would require the Agriculture Department department to make an incentive program for activities that reduce greenhouse gasolene and carbon paper emissions , such as no - cashbox land , as well as a cost - offset program .
“ At the present time , it is not completely clear how renewable vigor legislation and climate offset mart will function together , ” Golden say . winner will be determined by how carbon copy trading and renewable fuel policy are implemented .
The KSU psychoanalysis find that the six report made different assumptions about fundamental variable star that could importantly bear on the results , such as what farming offsets will be included in the Clean Energy bill . The economic impacts will deviate by region and by harvest and livestock sub - sphere .
The Clean Energy bill also shew a Renewable Energy Standard , requiring a portion of U.S. electricity to be produced from low - C renewable vigour sources , such as photovoltaic organization . According to KSU ’s analysis , as the grocery store expatiate , the agriculture sphere will see fiscal benefits .
The analysis could not close a definitive impact the Clean Energy bill would have on the agriculture sphere because it will depend on what climate variety policies are include . However , Jimmy Daukus , managing director of AFT ’s Agriculture and Environment Campaign , said he expects it to have meaning implications for Fannie Merritt Farmer and rancher .
“ Farmers and rancher have a capital mountain at post , ” Daukus said . If the Clean Energy notice is not excrete , the EPA will have to mold greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act . “ Regulations without opportunities will only convey cost to producer . Agriculture needs the USDA and others to analyze the core of a regulatory - only alternative to better infer the possible economical impact . ”
